Support of DTEAM VO

• Dimitris Zilaskos (Technical staff)
• Tiziana Ferrari (EGI.EU)

DTEM VO: 350 members VO managers: D. Zilaskos, M. Dimou, S. Traylen PROs: 1. It allows a common VO for use in our international task. This is particularly important for the investigation of issues, particularly for issues which are dependent on certain configurations, not localized to one site or country. Tests using the dteam VO makes it possible to test how widespread a problem is likely to be. Typically anyone who does not have an account on any other VO needs it for any testing or investigations which are not localized to their sites or country. It would seem appropriate that such work is carried out using something like the dteam VO rather than an application VO anyway. It is important for debugging and monitoring of services. If developers cannot be part of a similar VO, operational support may become a lot harder. 2. Some members of the SVG use the dteam VO exclusively for their work, not just SVG work but all their development and testing work. CONs: 1. A national/regional catch-all VO could suffice 2. Evidence of DTEAM usage? Very low in terms of used resources, 241,892 jobs amounting 1784 hours CPUtime since May. November: 38,450 jobs amounting just 73 hours.

OLA roadmap proposal

• Dimitris Zilaskos (Technical staff)

D. Zilaskos on behalf of the OLA Task Force

Procedure for setting Nagios test critical for COD

• Marcin Radecki (CYFRONET)

This session will also cover the issue of Nagios test terminology (CRITICAL test)

Security Service Challenges and EGI CSIRT: Update

• Sven Gabriel (Nikhef)

Migration to APEL AMQ client: Status update and discussion of roadmap

• John Gordon (STFC)

AOB

• Tiziana Ferrari (EGI.EU)

. collection of NGI input/specifications on Nagios probes. Deadline 14 Dic. . collection of NGI input on service management functionality. Deadline 14 Dic. . GGUS update on SUs for middleware support (T. Antoni) . srmv1 end of suppport